Improved typing for hass.data
In the past, one of the challenges with hass.data
was to correctly assign type information. Since it was typed as dict[str, Any]
, the only options were annotation assignments or cast
like:
data: MyData = hass.data[SOME_KEY]
This had several disadvantages. Not only was it necessary to annotate every assignment, but type checkers also basically pretended that the annotation would always be correct. Especially during refactoring, it could easily happen that one instance was missed, and while type-checking still succeeded, the actual code would be broken.
To fix that, it's now possible to use two new key types HassKey
and HassEntryKey
. With a little bit of magic, type checkers are now able to infer the type and make sure it's correct. Even when storing data.
An example could look like this:
# <integration>/__init__.py
from homeassistant.util.hass_dict import HassKey
MY_KEY: HassKey["MyData"] = HassKey(DOMAIN)
@dataclass
class MyData:
client: MyClient
other_data: dict[str, Any]
async def async_setup(hass: HomeAssistant, config: ConfigType) -> bool:
client = MyClient(...)
hass.data[MY_KEY] = MyData(client, {...})
hass.data[MY_KEY] = 1 # mypy error
# <integration>/switch.py
from . import MY_KEY
async def async_setup_platform(
hass: HomeAssistant,
config: ConfigType,
async_add_entities: AddEntitiesCallback,
discovery_info: DiscoveryInfoType | None = None,
) -> None:
data = hass.data[MY_KEY]
reveal_type(data) # MyData
async_add_entities([MySwitch(data.client)])
Storing data in a dict by entry.entry_id
? It's often better to just store it inside the ConfigEntry
directly. See the recent blog post about it. If that isn't an option, use HassEntryKey
.
# <integration>/__init__.py
from homeassistant.util.hass_dict import HassEntryKey
MY_KEY: HassEntryKey["MyData"] = HassEntryKey(DOMAIN)
async def async_setup_entry(
hass: HomeAssistant,
entry: ConfigEntry,
) -> bool:
client = MyClient(...)
hass.data.setdefault(MY_KEY, {})[entry.entry_id] = MyData(client, {...})